 |
 | Why is it? |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
Younghunter

I'm a VIP Member of PAbucks.com!! Highest Ranked Member!!
| Joined: 07 Sep 2005 |
| Posts: 728 |
| Location: Wisconsin |
| Age: 24 |
Zodiac:  |
|
|
Game Tokens: 9966 |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:36 pm |
|
 |
 |
Guns aren't a big concern of mine. Almost any modern day rifle will shoot sufficiently to take down a white-tail at moderate yardages. People worry about ballistics too much when in reality many aren't good enough to take shots at distances where ballistics matter, or they aren't even able to see the far distances where ballistics would matter. Spending a little time at the range to find the right bullet for the gun and sighting it in is about all you need. For people who hunt out West where far shots are common, I think guns are much more important than in the Midwest and East where shots are limited by cover.
I bought both guns that I use for hunting. No one gave them too me. One is a Mossberg 500, has a cantilever rifled barrel that I have a Bushnell trophy 1.75-4X scope, that covers my deer hunting where rifles aren't allowed. I also have a 28" vent rib barrel for that gun. That covers all my turkey, waterfowl, upland, trap shooting.
My rifle is a Browning A-bolt Hunter classic in a .270. I put a Leupold Vari-X II 3-9x scope on there.
both guns shoot great, I have my ammo picked out that shoot good out of them, and I clean them properly before and after hunting season (and then also during if they get shot a lot, and after target shooting).
-Matt
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | Personal Gun History |  |
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:36 pm |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
|
|
|
|
|  |