 |
 | What say you? |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
Anonymous
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:43 am |
|
 |
 |
What can we do? I guess you could call it Mission Impossible. How about getting the majority of hunters to take a good inventory of their favorite hunting grounds and decide whether to harvest doe's there or not. Have the hunters actually manage the deer, instead of them walking into the woods with an unfilled tag on their back thinking they HAVE to shoot a deer no matter what. It will never happen but it's nice to think about.
|
|
 | Junior hunters |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
NonTypical07

Pabucks.com Pro Staff Writer
| Joined: 12 Oct 2004 |
| Posts: 547 |
| Location: Duncannon, PA |
| Age: 23 |
Zodiac:  |
|
Hall Of Fame Member
|
Game Tokens: 6141 |
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:34 pm |
|
 |
 |
Personally Im not sure on what to do. We need to unite, not just the members here, but hunters statewide. We need to come up with a plan and put that plan into action. Like I read in an earlier post, we can sit around all day and talk about this, but lets do something about it. But in the meantime we need to adapt and make it work for now.
About people not seeing deer- I keep hearing "Ive killed deer out of my stand every year except this year, theres no deer" My response to this is that the deer might not be there, they might be on the other side of the hill. My point is that people got spoiled in the days where you just had to walk in the woods and you could see deer all day, now that people have to actually hunt, they have no idea what to do. Of the deer i have killed, not one of them has been out of the same tree.
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
renegade

Administrator
| Joined: 18 Oct 2004 |
| Posts: 3392 |
| Location: Central PA |
|
|
|
|
Game Tokens: 58777 |
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:04 pm |
|
 |
 |
Boy Dave, you said a mouthful. And I tend to agree with all you said. Especially the point that both you and Non-typ made; that was then, this is now, we must adapt! Follow the food. And you are sooo right that this is a very complex issue. Which is why just complaining about the pgc and about not getting “your” deer, does nothing but make you look like a fool. (not you personally)
In the original post John ask what can we do. A very loaded question but a good one as well. We could press the following issues:
Education- I think they were on the right track with the push for education but it just slacked off. Alt went around for 3 years but they didn’t advertise much the first year. The fouth year (last year) they were planning on having Wallingford, Grund, & Rosenberry do the touring but that didn’t happen. Wallingford did do some shows and such. Small seminars and workshops happen in various places on deer management and forestry issues, but they’re few and far between and not advertised heavily. They’re very interesting too I might add. People know that they are reducing the herd, but they don’t necessarily understand why.
Citizens task Groups – This was proposed by the Deer Management Working Group to the PGC in Jan. 2000, as a recommendation. These would be to help set acceptable deer densities in area’s, since the locals are the ones to receive damage by too high densities. It would also get input from local hunters of actual in the field reports.
Smaller management units- This is also something they proposed. I agree with Dave that these units are too big to manage with any kind of consistency. My unit (4D) in composed of parts of 11 different counties.
Voluntary check stations– This would help with data collection and better reporting rates.
Access- Better access to remote area’s via vehicle’s.
But what could we do as hunters without the input of bureaucrats? I think supplemental feeding and tree planting could go along way to help the forests recover. Just think if every hunter hauled one 4 lb. salt block into the woods in late winter or early spring, this would help tremendously with mineral requirements for both buck and doe.
If a program like the old Johnny Appleseed program could get established and would plant various species of trees like oaks and other fruiting trees. Wildflowers may be difficult to establish but food plots should take up some of the pressure. I’ve seen many places in the woods that have great sunlight such as old logging landings or even log roads, that would be great for planting. DCNR would have to give approval for some of this. They would also have to give access to allow atv’s as working tools for planting.
Just thinking out loud.
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
Anonymous
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:03 am |
|
 |
 |
Okay this is ridiculous. One thing they need to do is stop having antlerless season for the full two weeks. One week is plenty enough, after that it's overkill. A twelve day onslaught of the doe population is way too much. That's four times what it used to be! And that's not even counting the early seasons for doe. I hunt just as hard as anyone out there and I'm just sick of seeing absolutely nothing. Somebody better wake up fast! To be honest I can compare hunting just about anywhere right now to hunting on a deer damage area. Anyone who has hunted these areas in the past knows exactly what I'm talking about. DEAD. Sorry to sound so negative but I'm just about fed up! So I say only one week of doe season, please!
|
|
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
 |  |
 | |  |
Anonymous
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:22 pm |
|
 |
 |
I disagree with that Dave, concurrent buck/doe seasons are part of the problem.
The hunters that hunt buck only would not be out there moving deer around for the doe season.
#1 - Tag allocations should be lowered in some areas.
#2 - Some areas should be posted "No Doe Hunting" for a year or two so it has a chance to rebuild.
#3 - Separate the seasons.
#4 - Shorten the season for doe.
There is no need to have a 2 week doe season in some areas
There is no reason to have a chance to take several doe in some areas.
As you can tell by this post it is a some areas problem and a some areas solution.
Areas that still have too many deer, stay on this program that we have now.
But the time has come where we can no longer treat this on a state wide program.
|
|
 | Had Enough |  |
Anonymous
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2004 5:50 pm |
|
 |
 |
This message was edited by the management becuase of slanderous comments made towards members.
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2004 7:00 pm |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 15
|
|
|
|
|  |