Ghost "OT.. Its all a propagnada stunt. The PGC takes credit for Joe the landowner management. Where are the SGL bucks,,Somebody post a SGL buck in here besides a PGC employee. The SGL's are owned by the PGC..that is their land..I want to se how they manage their land. Somebody show me 3..4..5..6..7.8.year old bucks from SGL's''
By Golly, All this from a guy that claims he is control of many PA private land acres but can't manage to manage to have any bucks worth hunting on it!!!! More proof that doe herd over protection creates poor hunting and poor habitat. Many large chunks of privately controlled lands suffer from this self management, then demand the state go back to "their way", to fix it.
This is going to be long, sorry about that but there needs to be even more said. Half the problem in this argument is that it can't be explained in cute political slogans.
This area is predominately public land. It doesn't really make too much of a difference up here most private land in some form adjoins public lands, unless it is under intensive, QDM, managment. Cameron county is over 75% public land. Most of the townships listed in RSB's pics are predominately public. For example Highland township, Elk Co, take a look at that on a map. It is kind of the opposite of Ghost's hunting on a postage stamp of public land in Ohio surrounded by thousands of acres of private, agricultural, glaciated till soil and land. It amazes me how many guys will buy a fuzzy pic of a cat as a mountain lion and then explain away dozens of pics of big deer in the 2G no less.
Following the thoughts on this thread and past arguments is interesting, by paraphrasing, that it has been stated there are "no big bucks in PA". Then there have always been big bucks (but not because of the PGC in anyway). Then its "no big public land bucks". Then it is there aren't that many, then it evolves to they aren't really big enough, now we are to we don't have the biggest bucks in America. And we have devolved into anitdotal evidence of "my buddy" statements.
Guys commenting on where bucks are taken... Who would really admit exactly where on public land or even that you got a buck on public land? Seriously, you'd have to be a fairly dense hunter because the next year you'd be sharing your spot with dozens of your buddies and their relatives.
Old Timer why don't you mention the public land bucks shown in the CC Echo over the past few weeks? The Potter Leader Enterprise, The Endeavor News, The Renovo Record, the Bradford Era?. Maybe it is because many campers don't get the local paper when they are out spending their millions to save our local economy... I digress...
I suggest throwing another $0.75 cents at us locals and check out the Dec 17th Echo. It would be interesting to any hunter to read the "From a hundred years ago"? 1943 Dec 16th note listed, ""Many believe that the doe herd is near extinction, heavy toll was taken during three day season...the doe season has caused a lot of bitterness here. The majority of local hunters were oppossed to the permit system in the beginning. And after observing the results they have had no reason for changing their minds." Ah the "Good Ol' Days, the HeyDays" or was it the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's or 90's? Each decade this discussion has continued. It is the 70+ year old argument which still persists. One in which after 100 years of being wrong many hunters still are waiting to see "eradication".
The only reason I'm bother to chip in is that it would be to PA's, deer's, and hunters benefit if we can break the cycle of ignorance.
Ghost, we aren't the wheat belt for a reason. We don't have the type of highly protective buck regs that Kansas etc. have, nor would they be tolerated by PA hunters particularly the USP supporters. PA hasn't proven we can't top them when we had a three day doe season or "lots" of deer. (Although I never remember a time when during that time PA hunters fel there were "lots of deer"). It is not far from from Florida crying that their Key deer aren't as big as PA's. (At least in PA we have bucks that can score nationally, on public and private lands (except yours but you blame the PGC0
![thumbup [thumbup]](images/smiles/thumb.gif)
What is more obvious than the bias you carry is that it will never let you admit your wrong or that AR is working on PA on public and private land. Honestly, some of the bucks you wrote off which come from 2G public and private appear bigger or are dam close (to close to call on the hoof or a pic) to your coveted fat corn fed Ohio deer.
Old time management is akin to not pruning fruit trees because more buds equals more fruit, not culling a domestic herd or putting as many cows as you want per acre since more cows equals more money. How about not culling seedlings becuase more vegetable plants equals more vegetables right? Deer are no different, same rule applies and is especially more true because more buds don't spread disease, cause car wrecks, threaten the health of forests and therefore the very health of our economy and forest life in general.
This maybe harsh but there is no way around it, I'm disappointed that selfishness has over ridden common sense for many people. Other's may keep this thing going out of anger because they feel they have been mistreated or pinched by the PGC, which is still a form of selfishness.
One thing I've become certain of, Even though many people understand that this is the Good Old days and there is more opportunity to take a big buck than we've experienced in this state, I don't think the bickering will end during my time this whole thing will continue to continue for years yet.
(Especially since controversy creates money now.)
The good news is that there are positive's for the future generations. Like many hunters agreeing privatley and more publically that things are good than I've ever heard before plus strides in education in the youth and strides made by good organizations.
![antlers [antlers]](images/smiles/antlers.gif)